Implementation method and difference from IBM's concept
I have a disagreement with IBM's concept.They take a top-down approach to change the world.
These days, no one could control the amoeboid movement on the internet(this sparked a revolution at North Africa).
In the track of this, our concept of smart planet take a bottom-up approach to change the world.
The world that machines murmurs...
The keyword of our concept is “The world that machines murmurs”.
What exactly we try to do is equipping sensors and devices(also available on existing devices) with additional module to send information on Twitter.Users decide whether the information useful or not.It's also depend on users whether integrate the information into their applications or not.
Our Software Development Kit is available to the public free of charge.
Technical explanation why we've chosen Twitter to make information public is that there is no data traffic between device and applications.To reduce development cost and to make levels of entry lower are another reason why we use successful services as a infrastructure.
Technical explanation #1
Tweet directly on Twitter
Advantage: Absence of PC make the system durable and development cost lower.
Technical explanation #2
Tweet on Twitter via server
Advantage: Can reduce initial cost and make use of existing device and facilities.